<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Davis Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davislegal.net</link>
	<description>Study help, memonics and examsoft help for the struggling law student or those preparing for the Bar Exam.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bar Exam Grade Analyzer</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=460</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=460#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Mnemonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calculate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Repost &#8211; Bar Exam Grade Analyzer
       ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=460</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merger Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=436</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=436#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Mnemonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under the Merger Doctrine, if two or more consecutive estates vest in the same person, they merge into the greater estate and the lesser one is destroyed.
       ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=436</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctrine of Worthier Title</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=434</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=434#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Mnemonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worthier title]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under the Doctrine of Worthier Title, an inter vivos gift of a remainder to the heirs of the grantor is void because a remainder does not go to the heirs until the owner&#8217;s death.
       ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=434</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule of Shelly&#8217;s Case</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=432</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=432#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Mnemonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shelley's case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under the RULE OF SHELLEY&#8217;S CASE, the grantee of a life estate obtains a fee simple estate if the same document grants remainders for the same estate to the heirs of the grantee of the life estate.
       ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=432</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Bar Grade Analyzer</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=430</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=430#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calculate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mbe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have created a bar grade analyzer based on the formula used for the Feb 2009 Bar Exam. This will allow you to experiment with &#8220;What-If&#8221; situations. Keep in mind that the Feb formula was used for both the MBE and the Essays.
I wish everyone the VERY BEST of luck as you hold your breath [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=430</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murder</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=399</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=399#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steve.davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law Mnemonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depraved heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[felony murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manslaughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murder is an unlawful homicide, the unlawful killing of one human being by another with malice aforethought. Malice for murder may be an express intent to kill or implied by intent to cause Great Bodily Injury, intent to commit an inherently dangerous felony (felony murder rule), or intent to commit an act with awareness of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=399</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Escobedo Rule</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=395</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=395#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steve.davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escobedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Escobedo Rule was a precursor to the Miranda rule which states that a statement by an unindicted, targeted suspect in police custody is inadmissible at trial unless the police warns the suspect of the right to remain silent and provides an opportunity to consult/retain legal counsel. Escobedo v. Illinois.
      [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=395</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aguilar-Spinelli</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=388</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=388#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steve.davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aguilar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinelli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aguilar-Spinelli (2-Prong Test) Magistrate must receive:
1. Crediable Information (from)
2. Reliable Informant
Modern Test (Use on Bar Exams) &#8211; Ill. v Gates (PC established based on the Totality of the Circumstances)
1. Credable Information
2. Reliable Informant
3. Police Collaboration
4. Declaration Against Interest
       ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=388</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>14th Amendment &#8211; Voluntariness</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=386</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=386#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steve.davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntariness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under the due process clause of the 14th amendment, confessions must be voluntary.  The totality of the circumstances must be considered while taking into account of the suspect&#8217;s age, education, and physical &#038; mental condition plus the setting, duration, and manner of police interrogation.  Spano v. New York 360 U.S. 315 (1959) is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=386</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Amendment &#8211; Miranda</title>
		<link>http://davislegal.net/?p=384</link>
		<comments>http://davislegal.net/?p=384#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steve.davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miranda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davislegal.net/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 5th amendment is applied to the states through the 14th amendment and provides that no person &#8220;shall be compelled to be a witness against himself &#8230;&#8221;  The could held this view in Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
       ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davislegal.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=384</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
